The startling facts
of the Diana-Morrissey Phenomenon have raised an interesting question:
How do you judge whether a series of similarities is evidence of something other
than coincidence?
I have therefore devised "The P.A.L. Test", (P.A.L. stands for Precision, Abundance, and Location):
The P.A.L. Test
1. Precision: Are the similarities
precise?
2. Abundance: Are the similarities abundant?
3. Location: Are the similarities strategically located?
If all three criteria are met, it would be reasonable to regard the
similarities as evidence of something other than coincidence.